If your editing chops can improve published work product, hats off. You’ve fine-tuned a document that’s likely faced many rounds of editing, often by many hands. That’s all the more true for a high-profile Supreme Court opinion.
With that high bar in mind, legal-tech guru Bob Ambrogi recently ran Justice Thomas’s opinion in Bruen through one editing product. See what he found.
We took the same Bruen opinion and ran it through both BriefCatch 3 and Grammarly. Check out the output below. And enjoy deciding which product suits lawyers and judges the best!
By
